Breastfeeding a toddler
Because more and more women are now
breastfeeding their babies, more and
more are also finding that they
enjoy breastfeeding enough to want
to continue longer than the usual
few months they initially thought
they would. UNICEF has long
encouraged breastfeeding for two
years and longer, and the American
Academy of Pediatrics is now on
record as encouraging mothers to
nurse at least one year and as long
after as both mother and baby
desire. Even the Canadian Paediatric
Society, in its latest feeding
statement acknowledges that women
may want to breastfeed for two years
or longer and Health Canada has put
out a statement similar to UNICEF’s.
Breastfeeding to 3 and 4 years of
age has been common in much of the
world until recently in human
history, and it is still common in
many societies for toddlers to
breastfeed.
Why should breastfeeding continue
past six months?
Because mothers and babies often
enjoy breastfeeding a lot. Why stop
an enjoyable relationship? And
continued breastfeeding is even good
for the health and welfare of both
the mother and child.
But it is said that breastmilk has
no value after six months.
Perhaps this is said, but it is
patently wrong. That anyone
(including paediatricians) can say
such a thing only shows how ignorant
so many people in our society are
about breastfeeding. Breastmilk is,
after all, milk. Even after six
months, it still contains protein,
fat, and other nutritionally
important and appropriate elements
which babies and children need.
Breastmilk still contains
immunologic factors that help
protect the baby. In fact, some
immune factors in breastmilk that
protect the baby against infection
are present in greater amounts in
the second year of life than in the
first. This is, of course as it
should be, since children older than
a year are generally exposed to more
sources of infection. Breastmilk
still contains special growth
factors that help the immune system
to mature, and which help the brain,
gut, and other organs to develop and
mature.
It
has been well shown that children in
daycare who are still breastfeeding
have far fewer and less severe
infections than the children who are
not breastfeeding. The mother thus
loses less work time if she
continues nursing her baby once she
is back at her paid work.
It
is interesting that formula company
marketing pushes the use of formula
(a very poor copy of the real thing)
for a year, yet implies that
breastmilk (from which the poor copy
is made) is only worthwhile for 6
months or even less (“the best
nutrition for newborns”). Too many
health professionals have taken up
the refrain.
I
have heard that the immunologic
factors in breastmilk prevent the
baby from developing his own
immunity if I breastfeed past six
months.
This is untrue; in fact, this is
absurd. It is unbelievable how so
many people in our society twist
around the advantages of
breastfeeding and turn them into
disadvantages. We give babies
immunizations so that they are able
to defend themselves against the
real infection. Breastmilk also
helps the baby to fight off
infections. When the baby fights off
these infections, he becomes immune.
Naturally.
But I want my baby to become
independent.
And
breastfeeding makes the toddler
dependent? Don’t believe it. The
child who breastfeeds until he weans
himself (usually from 2 to 4 years),
is generally more independent, and,
perhaps, more importantly, more
secure in his independence. He has
received comfort and security from
the breast, until he is ready to
make the step himself to stop. And
when he makes that step himself, he
knows he has achieved something, he
knows he has moved ahead. It is a
milestone in his life.
Often we push children to become
"independent" too quickly. To sleep
alone too soon, to wean from the
breast too soon, to do without their
parents too soon, to do everything
too soon. Don’t push and the child
will become independent soon enough.
What’s the rush? Soon they will be
leaving home. You want them to leave
home at 14? If a need is met, it
goes away. If a need is unmet (such
as the need to breastfeed and be
close to mom), it remains a need
well into childhood and even the
teenage years.
Of
course, breastfeeding can, in some
situations, be used to foster an
over dependent relationship.
But so can food and toilet training.
The problem is not the
breastfeeding. This is another
issue.
What else?
Possibly the most important aspect
of nursing a toddler is not the
nutritional or immunologic benefits,
important as they are. I believe the
most important aspect of nursing a
toddler is the special relationship
between child and mother.
Breastfeeding is a life-affirming
act of love. This continues when the
baby becomes a toddler. Anyone
without prejudices, who has ever
observed an older baby or toddler
nursing can testify that there is
something almost magical, something
special, something far beyond food
going on. A toddler will sometimes
spontaneously, for no obvious
reason, break into laughter while he
is nursing. His delight in the
breast goes far beyond a source of
food. And if the mother allows
herself, breastfeeding becomes a
source of delight for her as well,
far beyond the pleasure of providing
food. Of course, it’s not always
great, but what is? But when it is,
it makes it all so worthwhile.
And
if the child does become ill or does
get hurt (and they do as they meet
other children and become more
daring), what easier way to comfort
the child than breastfeeding? I
remember nights in the emergency
department when mothers would walk
their ill, non-nursing babies or
toddlers up and down the halls
trying, often unsuccessfully, to
console them, while the nursing
mothers were sitting quietly with
their comforted, if not necessarily
happy, babies at the breast. The
mother comforts the sick child with
breastfeeding, and the child
comforts the mother by
breastfeeding.
Handout #21. Breastfeed a
Toddler—Why on Earth?.
January 2005
Written by Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC. ©
2005
This handout may be copied and
distributed without further
permission, on the condition that it
is not used in any context in which
the WHO code on the marketing of
breastmilk substitutes is violated